For years there was only 1 reputable way to store data on your personal computer – utilizing a hard disk drive (HDD). Nevertheless, this type of technology is currently displaying it’s age – hard drives are actually noisy and slow; they can be power–ravenous and frequently generate lots of warmth for the duration of intensive operations.

SSD drives, alternatively, are extremely fast, take in a smaller amount power and tend to be far less hot. They feature a completely new solution to file accessibility and data storage and are years in advance of HDDs when it comes to file read/write speed, I/O effectiveness as well as energy capability. Figure out how HDDs fare up against the more recent SSD drives.

1. Access Time

Image

SSD drives offer a fresh & revolutionary method to file storage according to the use of electronic interfaces instead of any sort of moving components and rotating disks. This brand new technology is noticeably faster, allowing for a 0.1 millisecond data access time.

Image

HDD drives rely on spinning disks for data storage applications. Each time a file will be used, you need to wait around for the right disk to get to the right position for the laser to access the data file you want. This ends in an average access rate of 5 to 8 milliseconds.

2. Random I/O Performance

Image

On account of the very same revolutionary technique allowing for speedier access times, you may as well appreciate much better I/O effectiveness with SSD drives. They will perform double the procedures within a given time in comparison with an HDD drive.

An SSD can manage at the least 6000 IO’s per second.

Image

Hard drives present slower data file access speeds due to the aging file storage and accessibility concept they are implementing. And they also display substantially slower random I/O performance in comparison with SSD drives.

Throughout our lab tests, HDD drives handled on average 400 IO operations per second.

3. Reliability

Image

SSD drives are meant to include as fewer moving parts as is feasible. They use a comparable technique to the one used in flash drives and are also much more efficient as compared to traditional HDD drives.

SSDs have an common failing rate of 0.5%.

Image

HDD drives utilize spinning hard disks for storing and browsing data – a concept since the 1950s. And with disks magnetically suspended in mid–air, rotating at 7200 rpm, the odds of something going wrong are considerably bigger.

The common rate of failing of HDD drives varies between 2% and 5%.

4. Energy Conservation

Image

SSD drives operate virtually noiselessly; they don’t create extra heat; they don’t mandate more cooling solutions and then use up significantly less electricity.

Trials have demostrated that the normal electric power usage of an SSD drive is somewhere between 2 and 5 watts.

Image

HDD drives are famous for getting loud. They demand further electric power for cooling down purposes. On a hosting server that has a lot of HDDs running all the time, you will need a good deal of fans to ensure that they’re kept cool – this will make them much less energy–efficient than SSD drives.

HDDs consume in between 6 and 15 watts.

5. CPU Power

Image

SSD drives permit quicker data file accessibility rates, that, in turn, allow the CPU to perform data file queries faster and then to go back to additional duties.

The regular I/O wait for SSD drives is simply 1%.

Image

In comparison to SSDs, HDDs allow for not so quick file access speeds. The CPU will be required to lose time waiting for the HDD to return the requested data, reserving its allocations meanwhile.

The average I/O delay for HDD drives is around 7%.

6.Input/Output Request Times

Image

It’s about time for a few real–world examples. We, at dancom, ran a complete system backup on a server using only SSDs for file storage purposes. In that process, the typical service time for any I/O request stayed below 20 ms.

Image

All through the very same lab tests with the same web server, this time fitted out using HDDs, performance was significantly sluggish. Throughout the web server data backup process, the regular service time for any I/O calls ranged somewhere between 400 and 500 ms.

7. Backup Rates

Image

Referring to back–ups and SSDs – we have spotted a significant improvement with the back up rate as we turned to SSDs. Right now, a normal server backup takes only 6 hours.

Image

Through the years, we’ve employed primarily HDD drives with our servers and we’re familiar with their general performance. On a hosting server designed with HDD drives, an entire web server back–up often takes around 20 to 24 hours.

With dancom, you may get SSD–powered web hosting solutions at reasonable prices. Our shared hosting plans and also the VPS servers can include SSD drives automatically. Go in for an web hosting account with us and see the way your sites will become far better at once.

  • Service guarantees

  •  
  • Our Virtual Private Servers include no setup charges and function in a reliable network delivering 99.9% of uptime. Full root/administrator access to the server warranted.

  • Compare our prices

  •  
  • Review the tools and characteristics coming with our Virtual Private Servers. You could start with a smaller VPS Web Hosting configuration and move up with only a mouse click as your demands increase.
  • Compare our hosting plans

  • Contact Us

  •  
  • Contact us day and night by email or by employing the super–fast ticketing platform. Our techs are going to answer any of your queries in up to 60 mins.